War

The Only Way to Fight a War


When I was growing up, my father always told me, “Never, ever start a fight; but always finish one.”

I didn’t really understand what dad meant by that until I started studying military history. The victor in any fight is the side that is willing to fight it out to the end.

The bullies who picked on me growing up nearly always did so because I didn’t fight back. It didn’t matter how many times they got in trouble. Often, that was just enough excuse to keep picking on me; to get back at the boy who got them in trouble. I finally stopped getting beat-up when I started throwing punches of my own.

Unfortunately, throwing those punches also got me in trouble. Because I defended myself someone thought I had done something wrong.

In watching this recent action between Israel and Hamas, I have seen much the same kind of mentality, both in the media and in those I know in the liberal blogosphere. “How dare Israel defend itself? Don’t they realize they’ve killed more Palestinians than Hamas has killed Israelis?” My favorite so far has been a “friend” on Facebook who posted, as his profile image, a sign that says, “Support Palestine: Stop the Genocide.”


Ex-aide: Saddam would not have allowed Gaza raid, NOW We’ve Done it!


The Associated Press today posted a story that is so utterly pointless for its very existence that it boggles the mind. Apparently, some loser Iraqi that used to be a somebody under Saddam Hussein’s viciously murderous government has issued a “tape” whereupon he says that Israel would never have been so bold to have hit Gaza they way it has if Saddam were still in power.

Of course, the very first question that comes to mind is… WHO CARES what some has been cutthroat has to say about Saddam “just hangin’ around” Hussein? The man is dead, D-E-D dead!

I mean, why the heck is this news? It would be like publishing a story in this week’s New York Times about some guy that is saying that all this Obama stuff wouldn’t be happening if Jefferson Davis was still in power. Yes, it would be just as newsworthy as that!

Here is the full (or should I say fool) AP report:

Ex-aide: Hussein would not have allowed Gaza raid (scroll down)

DUBAI - A former aide to Saddam Hussein said in an audio tape aired yesterday that Israel would not have dared to launch its current attack on Gaza if the Iraqi leader was still in power. But Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, the most senior member of the past regime still at large, said on the recording broadcast by Al Jazeera television that Iraqi insurgents would negotiate with Washington if the administration of President-elect Barack Obama withdrew from Iraq. “The barbaric . . . attack on our [Arab] people in Gaza is the natural result of the absence of Iraq, its national leadership and its leader . . . the martyr Saddam Hussein,” said Ibrahim, a leader of Iraqi insurgents. The authenticity of the recording could not be verified.

Ah, but this supposed “news” does serve one more Old Media purpose, doesn’t it? It gives just one more Jew hater an opportunity to blame Israel for all ills.

Of course it is all based on more gutless and illogical Arab delusion. Even were Saddam “necktie party” Hussein still around and in power in Iraq, Israel would have paid no never mind to what he and the Iraqis would have to say about hitting Gaza. Israel was never in the past known to cower in the presence of Saddam “rubber neck” Hussein. It is beyond logic or sense to imagine that they would this time were Hussein still alive.

The anti-Semitism of the media is beyond belief.

Read More →


A follow-up on Israel


Jeff “Maximos” Martin replied to my criticism and while I could make a reply over there, I’m doing so here so all you guys will go visit the nice site that they all have there.

Read More →


What’s Next For Israel, Hamas And Gaza?


Blogging about the issue has been relatively sparse on my part–largely because the issue is rather depressing to blog about. However, my thoughts on the conflict raging in the Holy Land can be found here for those who are interested.


Israel and the Just War Doctrine


I write today a response to Jeff Martin’s criticism of Israel with respect to the Catholic just war doctrine. I do think he’s in error, because he gives the facts a cursory glance and omits key details, but that only leads to my main criticism: I think he shows a bias against the Israeli side of the war.

Firstly though, I address the Catholic Church’s just war doctrine. Now let me start off by saying I have no ties with the Catholic Church, nor do I subscribe to its teachings, so for me this is purely an academic exercise. But to me it is clear that the “conditions for legitimate defense” are met by Israel in this case. Point by point:

Read More →


Israel’s Forgotten Soldier


In 2006 Israel was plunged into a war with Hezbollah (The Party of God) in Southern Lebanon. However, how many people remember why that conflict started? We all remember how it ended. Israel was left with doubts about its military ability to defend itself for the first time in its history. It ended up not going well at all.

The conflict in Southern Lebanon was started when Hezbollah launched a rocket attack on Northern Israel as a diversion for an anti-tank missile attack against two Israeli Humvees patrolling the border. Two soldiers survived the anti-tank missile attack and were taken prisoner and then spirited back into Lebanon. The deceased remains of those two soldiers were returned to Israel as part of a prisoner exchange after the conflict ended.

However, who here remembers what else happened a month earlier with Hamas in the south? Right now if you watch the news reporting, this is the most forgotten aspect of the current conflict in Gaza.

In June 2006, using a tunnel dug from Gaza across the border into Israel, Hamas soldiers came up from behind Israeli positions and captured Gilad Schalit. That was two years ago, and Gilad Schalit is still alive and is still held prisoner by Hamas in Gaza. The International Red Cross has been denied visitation, but an international envoy from Egypt has been able confirm he was still alive and brought him a new pair of eye glasses sent by his parents. Right now that is all that is known about his fate.

Now, why would this man be forgotten, especially by his own government? Yes, he is forgotten by his own government. In an article from the Jerusalem Post the current Israeli government has not even mention Sergeant Schalit in their cease fire terms in this current conflict! What kind of outrage would follow in this country had he been a US Service member who had his status confirmed by an Egyptian envoy as alive and well? There would be an outcry that would be deafening.

So far in Israel, there is a news paper story and a letter to the government pointing out their omission. It is a very big omission too. I think Israel needs to require Sgt Schalit’s return as a non negotiable condition for a cease fire. The opportunity to obtain his release will never be so good again.


The Smell of Success Against Global Terror in 2008


The indispensable Bill Roggio reports on the State of Jihad for 2008.

Iraq smells like roses. The counterinsurgency doctrine written by Petraeus and implemented by Odierno succeeded in turning around a situation that seemed hopeless two years ago. Green Zone control was turned over to Iraq this week. Al Qaeda has been crushed. Muqtada al Sadr is still going to Ayatollah school in Iran, while the Sadrist forces have been restrained by Iraq government forces. The peace is fragile, but should be in the capabilities of Iraq to maintain.

Pakistan smells like a chemical fire. Musharraf left office to be replaced by an elected president. Almost all the Pashtun tribal areas in the FATA and NWFP are under Taliban and al Qaeda control, and the Taliban insurgency is spreading to neighboring provinces. The Taliban insurgency has had ties to Pakistani intelligence forces (especially the ISI, or Inter-Service Intelligence agency) since it was founded, and this shows no sign of abating. With ISI complicity, an al Qaeda affiliated group conducted the Mumbai massacre. This has brought India and Pakistan to the brink of war and will likely lead to India attacking terror camps in Pakistani controlled parts of Kashmir, while NATO and US forces attack al Qaeda redoubts in the Taliban controlled parts of Pakistan. This will not stabilize Pakistan, which is quickly deteriorating toward failed state status, in which a state is no longer able to enforce its laws within its borders. Jihad attacks against other countries are very popular with the people of Pakistan. When prosperous older men marry up to four wives, who is left to marry the young men and what will those unmoored young men do to regain their sense of honor and belonging? Even if it doesn’t turn into a failed state the large number of unmarried, militant young men who buy into the ideology of Jihad promises danger from Pakistan.

Afghanistan has the heavy smell of an imminent storm. The main supply line goes through the Taliban controlled parts of Pakistan and convoys are regularly attacked. Al Qaeda and Taliban killers have safe bases and camps across the border in Pakistan and Iran, run the heroin smuggling gangs in Afghanistan, and are gaining political control in some provinces. The Taliban and al Qaeda continue to kill Afghan citizens, though their attacks on NATO forces have been mostly ineffective. This is not to say they are pussycats. They are still ruthless killers. It is not for nothing that Pashtun tribesmen have long been known as the world’s finest light infantrymen. Suicide bombing, once unthinkable, has come to Afghanistan. The counterinsurgency doctrine that was so successful with Iraq’s tribes will have to be adapted to the Afghan tribes, and then the Karzai’s government may expand its authority outside of Kabul.

India woke up and smelled the coffee this year. The Mumbai attacks shut down a major city for almost three days and made obvious the virulent hatred that powers the Jihad, as well as the incompetence of the Indian security forces. India and Pakistan have been brought to the brink of war by this attack, which was at the hands of Lashkar e Taiba with the assistance of Pakistan’s ISI.

Somalia smells like a flaming lake of human excrement from Dante’s Inferno. A few years ago it had become a full-on terrorist state, until Ethiopian troops rolled in and drove the al Qaeda allied As Shabaab out of Mogadishu. Now As Shabaab has requested full AQ affiliate status, Somalia has become a destination for the preachers and recruiters of Jihad. As pirates operate freely from its ports, Somalia is poised for another descent into total chaos.

Iran continues to smell like gunpowder. The state sponsor of global terror nears the finish line in its nuclear weapon development program. The rest of the world has no plan to do anything about it, and will do nothing. Iran continues to threaten to destroy Israel and the US. Iran lost in Iraq when the Sadrist forces were defeated. Iran’s Shiite proxy Hezbollah gained a place in the government of Lebanon, while its Sunni proxy in Israel, Hamas, took control of Gaza.

Yemen smells like Pakistan, or worse. As Roggio reports, “After Pakistan, Yemen is considered to be one of the largest havens for al Qaeda. Many powerful elements within Yemen’s government support al Qaeda’s presence. Thousands of Yemeni fighters returned from Iraq since mid-2007. Many have served in militias sponsored by the government to fight opposition groups. Yemen routinely frees jailed al Qaeda members.” The country where the USS Cole was bombed elected in August a bin Laden loyalist as its president.

Syrian terrorists and terror sites have been susceptible to counter-terror raids this year. It smells like napalm in the morning, small victories. The US raided an Al Qaeda camp in Syria this year. Someone blew up Hezbollah master terrorist Imad Mugniyah. And an Israel bomber run destroyed a nuclear laboratory site that Syria had built in secret with assistance from North Korea.

Al Qaeda affiliates in Phillipines and Indonesia have been driven underground this year. They may not smell like roses, but how about ripe bananas?

Read the report for analysis on Algeria and Israel.

* * *

Where US forces are able to work with a mostly friendly government and keep a low media profile, for example Phillipines, Indonesia and Algeria, the tide of Jihad can be turned back. Where the US cannot operate, such as Yemen and the Pakistani tribal regions, the Jihad threat grows very dangerous. Where the media throngs to cover military actions in the most sensationalist way possible, Jihad gains its greatest victories. al Qaeda’s global Jihad cannot win militarily against military opposition but only against those who cannot or will not fight it, such as in Pakistan and Yemen. AQ does not plan to win militarily against the “Crusaders” and “Byzantines,” as they call us, but in the media, by spreading anti-American and anti-Jewish propaganda via the useful fools of the multi-culturalist, morale massacring world media, who giddily believe the worst of any major country and romanticize the most savage behavior as long as the story is served with a side of Edward Said and Frantz Fanon.

US Civilian military leadership needs to keep its head in the fight, for political distractions are part of the enemy’s strategy. The pattern for military victory has been demonstrated in Iraq, and the long term strategy is to reinvigorate our moral strength by going back to our roots as a people. The Obama administration shows signs of keeping the winning military strategy, but it is the left’s programs of the last 100 years that have separated us from our roots, and it is the conservative, classical liberal tradition in America that will restore us to them.

Read More →


Quote Of The Day


Some geopolitical conflicts are morally complicated. The Israel-Gaza war is not. It possesses a moral clarity not only rare but excruciating.

Israel is so scrupulous about civilian life that, risking the element of surprise, it contacts enemy noncombatants in advance to warn them of approaching danger. Hamas, which started this conflict with unrelenting rocket and mortar attacks on unarmed Israelis — 6,464 launched from Gaza in the past three years — deliberately places its weapons in and near the homes of its own people.

This has two purposes. First, counting on the moral scrupulousness of Israel, Hamas figures civilian proximity might help protect at least part of its arsenal. Second, knowing that Israelis have new precision weapons that may allow them to attack nonetheless, Hamas hopes that inevitable collateral damage — or, if it is really fortunate, an errant Israeli bomb — will kill large numbers of its own people for which, of course, the world will blame Israel.

Charles Krauthammer.


Israel looks to play game changer in its war with Hamas


Pretty good take on the current conflict between Israel and Hamas. 

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are ramped up in away that has not been seen since 2006 and maybe before that. The IDF’s current military operations against Hamas are offering all the conditions for a much larger picture in terms of military action and a political statement in the region. With well over several hundred air sorties missions flown and that many targets engaged; plus, the IDF has deployed the Mediterranean’s strongest navy off of the Gaza strip in support, which conducted more than 50 attacks on Thursday. Hamas has no defense against a modern military and especially against a country with the will to use it. Lessons were learned against Hizballah during 2006’s bloody and inconclusive stalemate that proved to legitimize the extremist party and strengthen them politically, which led to increased support from Syria and Iran. The Israeli leadership is hoping this conflict leads to a game changer in Gaza and will eliminate Hamas as threat to their security and destroy them politically in Gaza.


Quote of the day, North Korea-style


“[North Korea would] not merely turn everything into a sea of fire but reduce everything treacherous and antireunification to debris and build an independent reunified country on it.”


North Korean armed forces minister Kim Il Chol, threatening a massive retaliation should South Korea and the United States attack his country.

Their rhetoric sure has changed since President Bush and SecState Rice unilaterally took them off the state sponsors of terrorism list, didn’t it?

Never fear, though; while making concessions like that (and others), Rice knew all along that “”only an idiot would trust the DPRK.”